Is there a problem with the legend of Robin Hood or Thuggee? Is it because of it drawing inspiration maybe from guerilla warfare? Is it because of it drawing the audiences’ attention away from its root cause analysis (RCA)? Can RCA reveal specific and unique conditions of individuals and/or systems making individuals and/or systems vulnerable to act/behave as Robin Hood/thug/guerilla (RHTG)? Can the common factor be individuals’ and/or systems’ variably successful to maybe invariably failed attempts at redistribution of variably available and yet maybe invariably inaccessible resources?
Can the haves themselves facilitate the have-nots into becoming the haves with the haves loaning to or sharing with the have-nots the knowhow about efficiently tapping into shareable resources? Can RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems realize that RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems may be just taking away the resources from the haves and giving them to the have-nots who would be bound to return those untapped resources back to the haves in the absence of the loaned or shared knowhow regarding how to efficiently tap into the taken away resources? Can RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems ever be the solutions when may always be the problems or the indications of problems which may need the solving?
Can RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems be behaving so either for irreverent fun with resourceful food being abundant or for resourceful food with irreverent fun being irrelevant until and unless RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems may be expected to realize why mourn for absent resourceful food when at least taste for food being present and why mourn for absent taste for food when at least resourceful food to consume being present? Can RHTG-individuals or RHTG-systems be contained and mitigated when all can evolve their own path of existing as long as their path of existing may not be breaching others’ path of existing?
Can the selfish gene of individuals or the selfish legacy of systems ever forgo their selfish birthright to exist and inadvertently outlast others? Can the tug of war ever end in a tie with likely-winning individuals or systems switching sides midway to prevent likely-losing individuals or systems from failing to exist?
Can RHTG-systems be only redistributing socioeconomic resources in general and healthcare in particular without addressing socioeconomic and healthcare issues precipitating and prolonging the need for RHTG-systems to redistribute resources? Can RHTG-systems be ever helping those in need of help to eventually learn to stand on their own without needing any further help so as to themselves become able enough for helping others still learning to stand on their own?
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.