Laws of Emotion: Loe NULLA to Loe III: Sir Isaac Newton's Apple And Thought's Gravity

Can zero/zilch law of emotion (Loe NULLA) be defined/discovered as law of inertia of balance in the pursuit to define/discover mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration of thought/thoughton?

Can first law of emotion (Loe I) be “every thought perseveres in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it” unless, with thought considered as body with mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration, Loe I can be more complete as “every body including thought perseveres in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it”?

Can second law of emotion (Loe II) be “the change in thought is proportional to the emotive force impressed, and occurs along the straight line along which that force is impressed” unless, with thought considered as body with mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration, Loe II can be more complete as “the change in motion including thought is proportional to the motive-emotive force impressed, and occurs along the straight line along which that force is impressed”?

Can third law of emotion (Loe III) be “that there is always an opposite and equal reactive thought to a thought: or that the actions of two thoughts on each other are always equal and directed in opposite directions” unless, with thought considered as body with mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration, Loe III can be more complete as “that there is always an opposite and equal reaction to an action: or that the actions of two bodies including thoughts on each other are always equal and directed in opposite directions”?

Can this completion visualization open a Pandora’s box wherein body acting only on body and thought acting only on thought can evolve to include body acting on thought and thought acting on body while following such completed laws?

Can mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration of thought be deciphered from mass and velocity thus momentum and acceleration of body set in motion by thought’s action whereafter when body is not set in motion by thought’s action, then the resistance force bore by body can be perceived?