Gambling With Immortality

Before gambling with immortality by cryopreservation in tow searching for immortality, should one understand whether the lure of immortality can neutralize the suffering of mortality?

Can a case be made that immortality may not be feasible even for gene because before gene, there has been dark/non-dark matter and dark/non-dark energy creating gene, and even before dark/non-dark matter and dark/non-dark energy, there has been nothing’s nothingness creating dark/non-dark matter and dark/non-dark energy?

Can only nothing be immortal with immortality feasible only for nothingness?

Is the pursuit of immortality actually the pursuit of longevity above and beyond the feasible longevity of existent at a given point in the space-time continuum?

Not just for genes and organisms as their vehicles, can this pursuit of longevity be for anything composed of dark/non-dark matter and dark/non-dark energy driven by physical, chemical, biological, electromagnetic and idiopathic unknown forces in the known and unknown multiverses?

Do even legacies of persons seeking longevity need legends as their vehicles when even laws of sciences seeking longevity needing multiverses as their vehicles?

Was gambling invented by the ancients to fairly distribute the proceeds of any win within the winning group whether or not every member in the winning group may have equally contributed to the win?

Did gambling invented to randomize the distribution and redistribution of available and acquired resources evolve to favor either the risk-takers who could wager everything at the risk of losing everything in the hope of winning everything or the odds-manipulators who could mathematically or socially manipulate the odds to win by negating/neutralizing the luck-rule-game-guiding randomization?

Would the gamble for longevity whether in terms of resurrection of buried or reincarnation of cremated, recreation as clones or procreation with gametes depend on whether resurrected or reincarnated, recreated or procreated would remember memories of their past with preserved consciousness in their cryopreserved parts or wholes?

If the avenues of longevity were meant to allay the fears associated with mortality, would the avenues of longevity have to evolve for allaying the fears associated with immortality especially if preserved consciousness were to lag way behind the consciousness of eras when the cryopreserved were to be resurrected or reincarnated, recreated or procreated?

As compared to futuristic recreation as clones and feasible procreation with gametes irrespective of surrogate-technology to quench the insatiable thirst for longevity in the due course of time, are even the wills-wishes for longevity wrongly christened as the wills-wishes for immortality just wishful thinking with nothing lasting forever secondary to only nothingness lasting forever?